lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
From
Date
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 12:28 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:

> No difference. Then I tried switching NO_NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS on, and then
> I get:
>
> Performance counter stats for 'xmodmap .xmodmap-carl':
>
> 9.009137 task-clock-msecs # 0.447 CPUs
> 18 context-switches # 0.002 M/sec
> 1 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec
> 315 page-faults # 0.035 M/sec
> <not counted> cycles
> <not counted> instructions
> <not counted> cache-references
> <not counted> cache-misses
>
> 0.020167093 seconds time elapsed
>
> Woot!

Something is very seriously hosed on that box... clock?

Can you turn it back on, and do..
while sleep .1; do cat /proc/sched_debug >> foo; done
..on one core, and (quickly;) xmodmap .xmodmap-carl, then send me a few
seconds worth (gzipped up) to eyeball?

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-10 12:59    [W:0.112 / U:1.860 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site