lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 12)
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > If we defer a resume request while a suspend is in progress, then when
> > the suspend finishes should the resume be carried out immediately
> > rather than queued? I don't see any reason why not.
>
> Well, it's not very clear what to return to the caller in such a case. I guess
> we can return -EAGAIN.

I would have said to return 0, just as if the resume had been queued.
But it doesn't matter very much.

Alan Stern



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-07 16:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans