[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?
    Wu Fengguang wrote:

    > The refaults can be drastically reduced by the following patch, which
    > respects the referenced bit of all anonymous pages (including the KVM
    > pages).

    The big question is, which referenced bit?

    All anonymous pages get the referenced bit set when they are
    initially created. Acting on that bit is pretty useless, since
    it does not add any information at all.

    > However it risks reintroducing the problem addressed by commit 7e9cd4842
    > (fix reclaim scalability problem by ignoring the referenced bit,
    > mainly the pte young bit). I wonder if there are better solutions?

    Reintroducing that problem is disastrous for large systems
    running eg. JVMs or certain scientific computing workloads.

    When you have a 256GB system that is low on memory, you need
    to be able to find a page to swap out soon. If all 64 million
    pages in your system are "recently referenced", you run into
    BIG trouble.

    I do not believe we can afford to reintroduce that problem.

    Also, the inactive list (where references to anonymous pages
    _do_ count) is pretty big. Is it not big enough in Jeff's
    test case?

    Jeff, what kind of workloads are you running in the guests?

    All rights reversed.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-08-05 19:57    [W:0.024 / U:13.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site