[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] ext2/3:

> Actually, there is something the file system can do to make journaling
> safe on degraded RAIDs: make the (checksummed) journal blocks equal to
> the RAID stripe size. Or, equivalently, pad out to the RAID stripe
> size each commit.
> This sometimes leads to awkward block sizes, but while writing
> to any *one* stripe on a degraded RAID-5 endangers the others, you
> can write to *all* of them with the usual semantics.

Well, that would work... but you'd also have to journal data, with the
same block size. Not exactly fast, but at least safe...

> That's one thing I really like about ZFS: its policy of "don't trust
> the disks." If nothing else, simply telling you "your disks f*ed up,
> and I caught them doing it", instead of the usual mysterious corruption
> detectec three months later, is tremendoudly useful information.

The more I learn about storage, the more I like idea of zfs. Given the
subtle issues between filesystem and raid layer, integrating them just
makes sense.

(cesky, pictures)

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-31 13:07    [W:0.042 / U:1.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site