lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] introduce tracehook_finish_jctl() helper
On 08/01, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > Confused. This patch has no effect.
>
> Indeed, the three patches changing do_signal_stop() have no immediate
> material effect. They all just clean up the code and prepare the hooks
> that utrace (or something like it) needs to make tracing stops mesh well
> with job control stops. I'd thought it might be simpler for review to just
> roll these three together and send you a single patch to replace
> signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch; but Oleg decided to keep it
> sliced smaller.

But let me repeat, I would be happy if these 2 new patches are folded
into signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-04 01:59    [W:0.472 / U:0.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site