lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
Date
On Saturday 29 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson writes:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> > > On Thursday 27 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:34:53 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > > (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14015
> > > > > Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
> > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > > > > Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (12 days old)
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125029329805643&w=3D4
> > > >
> > > > Not fixed. With 2.6.31-rc7 I'm still seeing repeatable testsuite
> > > > failures on powerpc64. Reverting to 2.6.30 makes the failures go away.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the update.
> > >
> > > I guess 2.6.31-rc8 doesn't make any difference, does it?
> >
> > I've scheduled a number of gcc bootstraps and testsuite runs
> > with -rc8 on x86, powerpc64, and arm. I'll post an update in
> > a day or so.
>
> 2.6.31-rc8 results in bogus testsuite failures on all three platforms.

That may be a result of the known inotify borkage in -rc8 that has been fixed
in the current Linus' tree.

Thanks,
Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-29 21:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans