[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD
On 08/27/2009 06:54 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> I hope that my example shows why doing it in the kernel is desirable -
> there is no safe way to keep the pre-O_CLOEXEC efficiency using just the
> library, but there IS a way to do it with kernel support:

You're describing a very special case where the performance implications
are really minimal and try to argue that is a good enough reason? I
don't think so.

If a program really has to do thousands of these safe open calls then it
can invest time into opening /dev/null for any of the unallocated
descriptors < 3. You can even embed this logic in the safer_open function.

➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-27 16:25    [W:0.081 / U:3.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site