[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] thermal: Only set passive_delay for forced passive cooling
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:17:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Setting polling_delay is useless as passive_delay has priority,
> so the value shown in proc isn't the actual polling delay. It
> also gives the impression to the user that he can change the
> polling interval through proc, while in fact he can't.
> Also, unset passive_delay when the forced passive trip point is
> unbound to allow polling to be disabled.
> Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <>
> Cc: Matthew Garrett <>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <>

I'll look over this - I seem to remember having some reason to set that,
but it escapes me now.

Matthew Garrett |

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-26 18:29    [W:0.068 / U:0.472 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site