[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] thermal: Only set passive_delay for forced passive cooling
    On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:17:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
    > Setting polling_delay is useless as passive_delay has priority,
    > so the value shown in proc isn't the actual polling delay. It
    > also gives the impression to the user that he can change the
    > polling interval through proc, while in fact he can't.
    > Also, unset passive_delay when the forced passive trip point is
    > unbound to allow polling to be disabled.
    > Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <>
    > Cc: Matthew Garrett <>
    > Cc: Zhang Rui <>

    I'll look over this - I seem to remember having some reason to set that,
    but it escapes me now.

    Matthew Garrett |

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-08-26 18:29    [W:0.019 / U:130.492 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site