[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible
On 08/25/2009 05:42 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2009-08-24 20:08:42, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:00:36AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Then to answer your question... ext2. You expect to run fsck after
>>> unclean shutdown, and you expect to have to solve some problems with
>>> it. So the way ext2 deals with the flash media actually matches what
>>> the user expects. (*)
>> But if the 256k hole is in data blocks, fsck won't find a problem,
>> even with ext2.
> True.
>> And if the 256k hole is the inode table, you will *still* suffer
>> massive data loss. Fsck will tell you how badly screwed you are, but
>> it doesn't "fix" the disk; most users don't consider questions of the
>> form "directory entry<precious-thesis-data> points to trashed inode,
>> may I delete directory entry?" as being terribly helpful. :-/
> Well it will fix the disk in the end. And no, "directory entry
> <precious-thesis-data> points to trashed inode, may I delete directory
> entry?" is not _terribly_ helpful, but it is slightly helpful and
> people actually expect that from ext2.
>> Maybe this came as a surprise to you, but anyone who has used a
>> compact flash in a digital camera knows that you ***have*** to wait
>> until the led has gone out before trying to eject the flash card. I
>> remember seeing all sorts of horror stories from professional
>> photographers about how they lost an important wedding's day worth of
>> pictures with the attendant commercial loss, on various digital
>> photography forums. It tends to be the sort of mistake that digital
>> photographers only make once.
> It actually comes as surprise to me. Actually yes and no. I know that
> digital cameras use VFAT, so pulling CF card out of it may do bad
> thing, unless I run fsck.vfat afterwards. If digital camera was using
> ext3, I'd expect it to be safely pullable at any time.
> Will IBM microdrive do any difference there?
> Anyway, it was not known to me. Rather than claiming "everyone knows"
> (when clearly very few people really understand all the details), can
> we simply document that?
> Pavel

I really think that the expectation that all OS's (windows, mac, even your ipod)
all teach you not to hot unplug a device with any file system. Users have an
"eject" or "safe unload" in windows, your iPod tells you not to power off or
disconnect, etc.

I don't object to making that general statement - "Don't hot unplug a device
with an active file system or actively used raw device" - but would object to
the overly general statement about ext3 not working on flash, RAID5 not working,


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-25 15:41    [W:0.313 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site