[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/4] tracing: Make syscall_(un)regfunc arch-specific
    On 08/24/2009 12:58 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
    > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:31:26PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
    >> On 08/23/2009 02:14 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
    >>> I really don't like that.
    >>> See how the s390 and x86 version of the above code are completely
    >>> identical?
    >>> Please put this in kernel/ptrace.c
    >> Yes, I see your point, and I think kernel/ptrace.c is a fine place for
    >> it. Making it conditional on CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS and
    >> CONFIG_HAVE_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is probably best too, though I think the
    >> latter should now be HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS.
    > As you prefer, this new name can be indeed more verbose.

    Actually, now I'm second-guessing the need to move these at all. Since
    they only make sense for CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS, can't they stay in
    kernel/tracepoint.c and just be conditional on HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS?
    The only real change needed is for the tracepoint declarations to also
    be conditional.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-08-24 22:03    [W:0.022 / U:19.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site