[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/4] tracing: Make syscall_(un)regfunc arch-specific
On 08/24/2009 12:58 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:31:26PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
>> On 08/23/2009 02:14 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> I really don't like that.
>>> See how the s390 and x86 version of the above code are completely
>>> identical?
>>> Please put this in kernel/ptrace.c
>> Yes, I see your point, and I think kernel/ptrace.c is a fine place for
>> it. Making it conditional on CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS and
>> CONFIG_HAVE_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is probably best too, though I think the
>> latter should now be HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS.
> As you prefer, this new name can be indeed more verbose.

Actually, now I'm second-guessing the need to move these at all. Since
they only make sense for CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS, can't they stay in
kernel/tracepoint.c and just be conditional on HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS?
The only real change needed is for the tracepoint declarations to also
be conditional.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-24 22:03    [W:0.088 / U:2.956 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site