Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:29:10 +0900 | From | Paul Mundt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] tracing: Rename TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE->_TRACEPOINT |
| |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:24:26PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:42:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:58:42PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > > > > > > > > > This thread flag is no longer specific to just ftrace, so > > > > > TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT may be a more apt name. > > > > > > > > Adding Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> in Cc, the sh tree also > > > > has the syscalls tracing support (in a seperate branch). > > > > > > Btw., is there an URI for that separate branch? > > > > > > Ingo > > > > I guess it's: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git \ > > sh/ftrace > > ok, i checked - this is not a pure topical tree, it's intermingled > with other SH changes, so it cannot be pulled into the tracing tree. > > Obviously only such trees can be pulled into the tracing tree that > limit their role to tracing and are non-rebasing. > Yes, post-2.6.32 merge window I'll keep the sh/ftrace branch isolated from the rest of the sh changes, at which point it should be possible to pull in to -tip directly. I generally do not rebase topic branches.
| |