Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [RFC][PATCH] smc91x: let smc91x work well with netpoll | From | DDD <> | Date | Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:40:05 +0800 |
| |
This patch changes too much and I didn't have the environment to test, so it is unverified patch. That's why I separate it from my previous patch, and send it solely as a RFC patch.
Hi Nicolas, Given that you are the maintainer of "smc91x" driver since 2004. Could you say somethings about this patch? Your input on this patch is greatly appreciated. :-)
Thank you very much, Dongdong
Patch Note: @@ -520,21 +522,21 - local_irq_disable(); \ + local_irq_save(flags); \ __ret = spin_trylock(lock); \ if (!__ret) \ - local_irq_enable(); \ + local_irq_restore(flags); \
Here, for "__ret = spin_trylock(lock)", I didn't use spin_trylock_irqsave() to replace spin_trylock(), because the current irq state have got by local_irq_save(flags).
--- drivers/net/smc91x.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/smc91x.c index 1c70e99..7cabea1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/smc91x.c +++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.c @@ -196,21 +196,23 @@ static void PRINT_PKT(u_char *buf, int length) /* this enables an interrupt in the interrupt mask register */ #define SMC_ENABLE_INT(lp, x) do { \ unsigned char mask; \ - spin_lock_irq(&lp->lock); \ + unsigned long smc_enable_flags; \ + spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->lock, smc_int_flags); \ mask = SMC_GET_INT_MASK(lp); \ mask |= (x); \ SMC_SET_INT_MASK(lp, mask); \ - spin_unlock_irq(&lp->lock); \ + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, smc_int_flags); \ } while (0) /* this disables an interrupt from the interrupt mask register */ #define SMC_DISABLE_INT(lp, x) do { \ unsigned char mask; \ - spin_lock_irq(&lp->lock); \ + unsigned long smc_disable_flags; \ + spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->lock, smc_disable_flags); \ mask = SMC_GET_INT_MASK(lp); \ mask &= ~(x); \ SMC_SET_INT_MASK(lp, mask); \ - spin_unlock_irq(&lp->lock); \ + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, smc_disable_flags); \ } while (0) /* @@ -520,21 +522,21 @@ static inline void smc_rcv(struct net_device *dev) * any other concurrent access and C would always interrupt B. But life * isn't that easy in a SMP world... */ -#define smc_special_trylock(lock) \ +#define smc_special_trylock(lock, flags) \ ({ \ int __ret; \ - local_irq_disable(); \ + local_irq_save(flags); \ __ret = spin_trylock(lock); \ if (!__ret) \ - local_irq_enable(); \ + local_irq_restore(flags); \ __ret; \ }) -#define smc_special_lock(lock) spin_lock_irq(lock) -#define smc_special_unlock(lock) spin_unlock_irq(lock) +#define smc_special_lock(lock, flags) spin_lock_irq(lock, flags) +#define smc_special_unlock(lock, flags) spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) #else -#define smc_special_trylock(lock) (1) -#define smc_special_lock(lock) do { } while (0) -#define smc_special_unlock(lock) do { } while (0) +#define smc_special_trylock(lock, flags) (1) +#define smc_special_lock(lock, flags) do { } while (0) +#define smc_special_unlock(lock, flags) do { } while (0) #endif /* @@ -548,10 +550,11 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_pkt(unsigned long data) struct sk_buff *skb; unsigned int packet_no, len; unsigned char *buf; + unsigned long flags; DBG(3, "%s: %s\n", dev->name, __func__); - if (!smc_special_trylock(&lp->lock)) { + if (!smc_special_trylock(&lp->lock, flags)) { netif_stop_queue(dev); tasklet_schedule(&lp->tx_task); return; @@ -559,7 +562,7 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_pkt(unsigned long data) skb = lp->pending_tx_skb; if (unlikely(!skb)) { - smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock); + smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock, flags); return; } lp->pending_tx_skb = NULL; @@ -569,7 +572,7 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_pkt(unsigned long data) printk("%s: Memory allocation failed.\n", dev->name); dev->stats.tx_errors++; dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++; - smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock); + smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock, flags); goto done; } @@ -608,7 +611,7 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_pkt(unsigned long data) /* queue the packet for TX */ SMC_SET_MMU_CMD(lp, MC_ENQUEUE); - smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock); + smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock, flags); dev->trans_start = jiffies; dev->stats.tx_packets++; @@ -633,6 +636,7 @@ static int smc_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) struct smc_local *lp = netdev_priv(dev); void __iomem *ioaddr = lp->base; unsigned int numPages, poll_count, status; + unsigned long flags; DBG(3, "%s: %s\n", dev->name, __func__); @@ -658,7 +662,7 @@ static int smc_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) return 0; } - smc_special_lock(&lp->lock); + smc_special_lock(&lp->lock, flags); /* now, try to allocate the memory */ SMC_SET_MMU_CMD(lp, MC_ALLOC | numPages); @@ -676,7 +680,7 @@ static int smc_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) } } while (--poll_count); - smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock); + smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock, flags); lp->pending_tx_skb = skb; if (!poll_count) { -- 1.6.0.4
| |