Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:12:05 +0300 | From | "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects |
| |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:36:14AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > >> So where is the problem here? > > > > If virtio net in guest could be improved instead, everyone would > > benefit. > > So if I whip up a virtio-net backend for vbus with a PCI compliant > connector, you are happy?
I'm currently worried about venet versus virtio-net guest situation, if you drop it and switch to virtio net instead that issue's resolved.
I don't have an opinion on vbus versus pci, and I only speak for myself.
-- MST
| |