Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:33:54 +0800 | Subject | Re: -mm hang while shutdown with printk_delay | From | Dave Young <> |
| |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Dave Young<hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Dave Young<hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Andrew >> Morton<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:25:22 +0800 Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Test with printk_delay=200, >>>> >>>> /sbin/halt -p >>>> >>>> kernel hang after following message: >>>> >>>> Disabling non-boot CPUs >>>> >>>> There's no such problem with 2.6.31-rc6 >>> >>> umm, OK. But -mm contains six patches: >>> >>> printk-boot_delay-rename-printk_delay_msec-to-loops_per_msec.patch >>> printk-boot_delay-rename-printk_delay_msec-to-loops_per_msec-fix.patch >>> printk-boot_delay-rename-printk_delay_msec-to-loops_per_msec-fix-2.patch >>> printk-add-printk_delay-to-make-messages-readable-for-some-scenarios.patch >>> printk-add-printk_delay-to-make-messages-readable-for-some-scenarios-fix.patch >>> printk-add-printk_delay-to-make-messages-readable-for-some-scenarios-cleanup.patch >>> >>> from yourself. Are they the cause? >>> >> >> Actually I tested 2.6.31-rc6 with the above six patches applied, >> there's no such problem. >> > > I'm manually bisecting the mm patch series, hope find cause.
Again weird result:
linux-futexh-place-kernel-types-behind-__kernel__.patch #bisect good # # # edac # edac-mpc85xx-add-p2020ds-support.patch #edac-mpc85xx-add-mpc83xx-support.patch: smp_processor_id() bug? edac-mpc85xx-add-mpc83xx-support.patch edac-fix-resource-size-calculation.patch edac-i3200-memory-controller-driver.patch edac-i3200-memory-controller-driver-fix-offset-of-reg-in-i3200_edac-module.patch # bisect bad
I put printk_delay patches to the head of queue. test five times, same results.
bash-3.1$ grep EDAC .config CONFIG_EDAC=y # CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_EDAC_MM_EDAC is not set
There's no difference between bad/good kernel indeed because the edac code is not compiled.
hardware is dell e5400 distribution is slackware 12.2
BTW, there's lockdep warnings while umounting a reiserfs partition, but I think it is not relevant.
Confused...
-- Regards dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |