Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:59:35 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects |
| |
On 08/17/2009 05:16 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote: >> My opinion is that this is a duplication of effort and we'd be better >> off if everyone contributed to enhancing virtio, which already has >> widely deployed guest drivers and non-Linux guest support. >> >> It may have merit if it is proven that it is technically superior to >> virtio (and I don't mean some benchmark in some point in time; I mean >> design wise). So far I haven't seen any indications that it is. >> >> > > The design is very different, so hopefully I can start to convince you > why it might be interesting. >
We've been through this before I believe. If you can point out specific differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear (and steal) them though.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| |