Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:15:17 +0300 | From | Artem Bityutskiy <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: constify seq_operations |
| |
On 08/11/2009 10:47 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > A while ago I made a semantic patch to introduce const on file_operations > and and input_device_id types. I tested it on 142 files in which the > change had already been made and got the same result in each case. I have > run it on linux-next and obtained the attached result. However, I have > not checked any of these results, so this is not meant as a submitted > patch, but as a starting point for someone who wants to look further into > the problem. > > julia >
snip
> diff -u -p a/fs/ubifs/xattr.c b/fs/ubifs/xattr.c > --- a/fs/ubifs/xattr.c 2009-06-27 09:35:06.000000000 +0200 > +++ b/fs/ubifs/xattr.c 2009-08-11 22:42:24.000000000 +0200 > @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ enum { > > static struct inode_operations none_inode_operations; > static struct address_space_operations none_address_operations; > -static struct file_operations none_file_operations; > +static const struct file_operations none_file_operations;
Fixed this in UBIFS. Also made the inode operation const. Thanks. Pushed to ubifs-2.6.git: http://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git/commit/2d132c333e9f88684801c9b80e6ba086da4f0ea0
-- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |