Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:12:34 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages? |
| |
On 08/13/2009 06:46 PM, Rik van Riel wrote: > We need to ignore the referenced bit on active anon pages > on very large systems, but it could indeed be helpful to > respect the referenced bit on smaller systems. > > I have no idea where the cut-off between them would be. > > Maybe at inactive_ratio <= 4 ?
Why do we need to ignore the referenced bit in such cases? To avoid overscanning?
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| |