[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
    On Thursday 13 August 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
    > > Right now, the number of copy operations in your code is the same.
    > > You are doing the copy a little bit later in skb_copy_datagram_iovec(),
    > > which is indeed a very nice hack. Changing to a virtqueue based method
    > > would imply that the host needs to add each skb_frag_t to its outbound
    > > virtqueue, which then gets copied into the guests inbound virtqueue.
    > Which is a lot more code than just calling skb_copy_datagram_iovec.

    Well, I don't see this part as much of a problem, because the code
    already exists in virtio_net. If we really wanted to go down that road,
    just using virtio_net would solve the problem of frame handling
    entirely, but create new problems elsewhere, as we have mentioned.

    Arnd <><

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-08-13 17:01    [W:0.024 / U:18.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site