[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC Patch 1/2] kexec: show memory info in /proc/iomem
Amerigo Wang <> writes:

2> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Amerigo Wang <> writes:
>>>> Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <>
>>>> We can inspect the image we are going to load to get this information.
>>>> In fact /sbin/kexec already inspects the image we are going to load
>>>> to get this information. Putting this in the kernel adds kernel
>>>> complexity for no gain.
>>> /sbin/kexec is supported to know this, of course. But this is not for
>>> /sbin/kexec, this is for user (or other programs) to observe the memory
>>> information, so that he can know the memory he reserved is too much or not.
>>> Without this, it is a little hard to use patch 2/2.
>> So add on option to /sbin/kexec.
> This can be another choice.
>> Furthermore none of this does a good job of predicting how much
>> memory /sbin/fsck will require to check the filesystem before we
>> write a crash dump.
> No one actually knows this without testing... But if 128M on x86 is still not
> enough, that is probably a bug of fsck, not our fault.

x86 covers a very large range of hardware. Some of it nearly as large as
the big ia64 machines. So why would ia64 require significantly more memory
than x86?


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-12 04:43    [W:0.061 / U:2.524 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site