lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New MMC maintainer needed
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:13:28PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> Con:
>>
>> - The scanning code gets less clear as you increase the number of
>> possible paths through it.
>>
>> - Different systems will have different init sequences, possibly
>> provoking bugs in the cards.
>>
>> - Host driver writers now have more capability bits they have to
>> consider. And these might be less than obvious since SD/MMC/SDIO are
>> normally compatible so these bits seem useless.
>>
>> - With the current logic (which was better in the first version),
>> "normal" drivers will have to explicitly state that they work as
>> intended by setting all bits.
>
> And the pro is objective.
>
>> Pro:
>>
>> - A slightly reduced scanning time.
>
> That's great! Why do you disregard this so easily?
>

Ping. Adrian, do you have any initialisation times for this patch? I'm
afraid I don't have any eMMC hardware, so I'm not able to gather any
numbers.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-11 16:05    [W:0.097 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site