lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] cfq-iosched: get rid of the need for __GFP_FAIL in cfq_find_alloc_queue()
On Thu, Jul 09 2009, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:26:17PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26 2009, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > > Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Setup an emergency fallback cfqq that we allocate at IO scheduler init
> > > > time. If the slab allocation fails in cfq_find_alloc_queue(), we'll just
> > > > punt IO to that cfqq instead. This ensures that cfq_find_alloc_queue()
> > > > never fails without having to ensure free memory.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > block/cfq-iosched.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > > > 1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > > > index c760ae7..91e7e0b 100644
> > > > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > > > +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Fallback dummy cfqq for extreme OOM conditions
> > > > + */
> > > > + struct cfq_queue oom_cfqq;
> > >
> > > OK, so you're embedding a cfqq into the cfqd. That's 136 bytes, so I
> > > guess that's not too bad.
> > >
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Our fallback cfqq if cfq_find_alloc_queue() runs into OOM issues.
> > > > + * Grab a permanent reference to it, so that the normal code flow
> > > > + * will not attempt to free it.
> > > > + */
> > > > + cfq_init_cfqq(cfqd, &cfqd->oom_cfqq, 1, 0);
> > > > + atomic_inc(&cfqd->oom_cfqq.ref);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > I guess this is so we never try to free it, good. ;)
> > >
> > > One issue I have with this patch is that, if a task happens to run into
> > > this condition, there is no way out. It will always have the oom_cfqq
> > > as it's cfqq. Can't we fix that if we recover from the OOM condition?
> >
> > Yeah, I fixed that about an hour after posting the patches. See:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=0370bc158cb1d5faa4b8a38c0de3211f0fd5bd64
> >
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> I think above patch might not fix the issue of an oom_cfqq getting stuck
> with an io context. The reason being that once we allocate the cfqq, it
> will be cached in cic and once next request comes, we will retrieve it
> from cic and never call cfq_get_queue()/cfq_find_alloc_queue().
>
> I think we probably need to do cfqq == oom_cfqq check in cfq_set_request()
> also.

Yes good catch, this is needed too! Can you please send as a "real"
patch with signed-off-by added? Thanks!

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-09 19:41    [W:0.064 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site