Messages in this thread | | | From | Joao Correia <> | Date | Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:25:56 +0100 | Subject | Re: Soft-Lockup/Race in networking in 2.6.31-rc1+195 ( possibly?caused by netem) |
| |
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jarek Poplawski<jarkao2@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Jarek Poplawski wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 02:03:50PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Jarek Poplawski wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > I have the feeling that the code relies on some implicit cpu >> > > > > boundness, which is not longer guaranteed with the timer migration >> > > > > changes, but that's a question for the network experts. >> > > > >> > > > As a matter of fact, I've just looked at this __netif_schedule(), >> > > > which really is cpu bound, so you might be 100% right. >> > > >> > > So the watchdog is the one which causes the trouble. The patch below >> > > should fix this. >> > >> > I hope so. On the other hand it seems it should work with this >> > migration yet, so it probably needs additional debugging. >> >> Right. I just provided the patch to narrow down the problem, but >> please test the fix of the hrtimer migration code which I sent out a >> bit earlier: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/9/150 >> >> It fixes a possible endless loop in the timer code which is related to >> the migration changes. Looking at the backtraces of the spinlock >> lockup I think that is what you hit. > > Actually, Andres and Joao hit this, and I hope they'll try these two > patches. > > Thanks, > Jarek P. >
I can only try later on today. Will post back as soon as i do it.
Joao Correia
| |