Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:56:49 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [KVM PATCH v9 2/2] KVM: add iosignalfd support |
| |
On 07/07/2009 03:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> Seriously, why add artificial limitations? >>> IMO, addr=0,len=1 and addr=0,len=2 should not conflict. >>> >>> >>> >> They should not conflict, but a two byte write need not hit a one byte >> registration. >> > > Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. I think it should be possible to > create 2 fds: > > addr = 0 > len = 1 > addr = 0 > len = 2 > and at most one will ever trigger. > > But current code will not let you create the second one. >
I agree then. Good catch.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| |