Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:22:50 +0300 | From | "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> | Subject | Re: [KVM PATCH v9 2/2] KVM: add iosignalfd support |
| |
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:53:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> + /* address-range must be precise for a hit */ >>> >> >> So there's apparently no way to specify that >> you want 1,2, or 4 byte writes at address X? >> > > Why would you want that?
Donnu. Why would anyone want to catch 8 byte writes at all? Seriously, why add artificial limitations? IMO, addr=0,len=1 and addr=0,len=2 should not conflict.
-- MST
| |