lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [tip:x86/cleanups] x86: Clean up mtrr/cleanup.c
From
Hi Jaswinder,

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Jaswinder Singh
Rajput<jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 02:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> > >  static struct var_mtrr_range_state __initdata range_state[RANGE_NUM];
>> > > +
>> > >  static int __initdata debug_print;
>> > > +#define Dprintk(x...) do { if (debug_print) printk(KERN_DEBUG x); } while (0)
>> > > +
>> > > +
>> >
>> > two blank lines?
>>
>> ah, yes - i moved them around.
>>
>> > > +#define BIOS_BUG_MSG KERN_WARNING \
>> > > + "WARNING: BIOS bug: VAR MTRR %d contains strange UC entry under 1M, check with your system vendor!\n"
>> >
>> > No user for this
>>
>> yeah. Mind sending a patch for these? (and any other things you
>> might notice)
>>
>
> But why you did this stupidity.
>
> I clearly specified that these are trivial clean-ups, if you found any
> issue in the patch you should ping me. Instead of adding crap from your
> side.

What's with the attitude? It's perfectly okay for a commiter to change
the patch as long as it's mentioned in the changelog. And that's
usually much faster to do that for minor issues rather than ping the
original submitter and wait for a resend.

Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-05 14:03    [W:0.090 / U:1.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site