lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 0/4] perf_counter tools: support annotation of live kernel modules

    * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:

    > On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >
    > (squirrels suggestions away for later reference)
    >
    > > Btw, another thing: we are thinking about making -F 1000 (1 KHz
    > > auto-freq sampling) the default for perf top and perf record. This
    > > way we'd always gather enough data (and never too much or too little
    > > data), regardless of the intensity of the workload. Have you played
    > > with -F before, what's your general experience about it? It's
    > > particularly useful for 'rare' and highly fluctuating events like
    > > cache-misses.
    > >
    > > Maybe 1KHz is a bit too low - Oprofile defaults to 100000 cycles
    > > interval by default which is about 10 KHz on a 1GHz box and 30
    > > KHz on a 3GHz box. Perhaps 10 KHz is a better default?
    >
    > My default usage is 1000Hz to keep overhead low. Works fine for
    > me.

    ah, so you use -F by default?

    I still think 10 KHz would be better - especially for really short
    runs like 'perf record -f -g ./git gc'. Since Oprofile samples at 26
    KHz by default, we must not go to a too low frequency, otherwise
    people might get a 'hm, the perf profiles are worse than the
    Oprofile ones' first impression ...

    We could perhaps add a freq=1000 switch to .perfconfig - we have
    Git's util/config.c facility - it's just unused right now ;-)

    [ Look at the Git sources about how config.c is used. ]

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-07-03 09:29    [W:0.023 / U:0.508 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site