lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: MMC: Make the configuration memory resource optional
Date
On 29 Jul 2009, at 13:58, Ian Molton <ian@mnementh.co.uk> wrote:

> Magnus Damm wrote:
>
>>> Indeed. It's actually much worse than you say, each individual ARM
>>> architecture has its own clock API implementation of varying
>>> quality and
>>> of course there are architectures that don't do the clock API at
>>> all.
>> Yeah. This is exactly why I don't want to block on the clocklib
>> implementation.
>
> Yeah, good idea... lets ignore the problem until its so big we cant
> fix it at all...

The problem here is sufficiently substantial that I'd be impressed if
we managed to get a good solution in within a single kernel release.
This does help encourage people to keep local hacks but those are much
more realistic.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-29 15:15    [W:0.078 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site