Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:32:22 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree |
| |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:17:40PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:35:04 +1000 > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > Hi Alan, > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:29:11 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > > I need to look at the actual diff, but the combination looks completely > > > bogus unless I'm misreading the fixup which is possible. > > > > Below is the actual patch from the usb.current tree. > > Thanks - ok that is probably safe. The change I was worried about (the > error paths not adjusting port->count are ok as it gets zeroed within the > mutex) > > Not sure its safe versus hangup but neither was the old code 8) > > Oliver: I'll send you an alternative patch later today/tomorrow that uses > the ASYNC flags.
Should I just drop Oliver's existing patch from my tree for now then?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |