Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:18:24 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] documentation: make it clear that sysfs is optional |
| |
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:10:33 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:06:42AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > From: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@ixiacom.com> > > Subject: [PATCH] documentation: make it clear that sysfs is optional > > > > The original text suggested that sysfs is mandatory and always > > compiled in the kernel. > > But it should be :)
Well, you have the option of making it non-optional.
> Seriously, who turns sysfs off these days, does anyone? If so, why?
Why is it configurable then?
--- ~Randy LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/
| |