lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[Patch RFC 21/37] affs: use semaphore_init instead of init_MUTEX
The usage of these "mutex" is non obvious and probably a completion
in some places. Make it them semaphores.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/affs/super.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-tip/fs/affs/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/fs/affs/super.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/fs/affs/super.c
@@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
{
struct affs_inode_info *ei = (struct affs_inode_info *) foo;

- init_MUTEX(&ei->i_link_lock);
- init_MUTEX(&ei->i_ext_lock);
+ semaphore_init(&ei->i_link_lock);
+ semaphore_init(&ei->i_ext_lock);
inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
}




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-26 10:27    [W:0.261 / U:12.656 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site