Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:18 +0200 | From | Martin Schwidefsky <> | Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() |
| |
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:11:13 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:56 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > I would like to merge the new support that depends on this in 2.6.32, > > > so unless there's major objections, I'd like this to go in early during > > > the merge window. We can sort out separately how to carry the patch > > > around in -next until then since the powerpc tree will have a dependency > > > on it. > > > > Can't see any problem with that. > > CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so > far nobody objected to the patch itself) > > IE. The patch affects all archs, though it's a trivial change every > time, but I'll have stuff in powerpc-next that depends on it, and so I'm > not sure what the right approach is here. Should I put it in the powerpc > tree ? > > I also didn't have any formal Ack from anybody, neither mm folks nor > arch maintainers :-)
Well the change is trivial, it just adds another unused argument to the macros. For the records: it still compiles on s390.
-- blue skies, Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
|  |