lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS
From
2009/7/13 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>:
> On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 23:04 +0800, tom.leiming@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,Peter
>>
>> Currently lockdep uses recursion DFS(depth-first search) algorithm to
>> search target in checking lock circle(check_noncircular()),irq-safe
>> -> irq-unsafe(check_irq_usage()) and irq inversion when adding a new
>> lock dependency. This patches replace the current DFS with BFS, based on
>> the following consideration:
>>
>>     1,no loss of efficiency, no matter DFS or BFS, the running time
>>     are O(V+E) (V is vertex count, and E is edge count of one
>>     graph);
>
> I'd still like to get some feedback on the loss of that generation count
> optimization done by DaveM, I haven't had time to analyze the
> ramifications of that.
>
>

Hi, Ingo and Peter

As you said, BFS patch-set is valuable(decrease kernel stack consume
largely, and report
the shortest circle).

It has been pending on lkml silently for several monthes, and I hope
it may be merged to
tip-tree or other tree. I don't know what we should and can do to make
it being accepted by tip-tree.
Anyway, I'd like to do any fixes for it to be merged.

Any suggestions, ideas or objections?

Thanks.

--
Lei Ming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-16 06:41    [W:0.151 / U:2.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site