lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv4] uio: add generic driver for PCI 2.3 devices
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 03:08:29PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:13:40PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > This adds a generic uio driver that can bind to any PCI device. First
> > user will be virtualization where a qemu userspace process needs to give
> > guest OS access to the device.
> >
> > Interrupts are handled using the Interrupt Disable bit in the PCI command
> > register and Interrupt Status bit in the PCI status register. All devices
> > compliant to PCI 2.3 (circa 2002) and all compliant PCI Express devices should
> > support these bits. Driver detects this support, and won't bind to devices
> > which do not support the Interrupt Disable Bit in the command register.
> >
> > It's expected that more features of interest to virtualization will be
> > added to this driver in the future. Possibilities are: mmap for device
> > resources, MSI/MSI-X, eventfd (to interface with kvm), iommu.
> >
> > Acked-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Hans, Greg, please review and consider for upstream.
> >
> > This is intended to solve the problem in virtualization that shared
> > interrupts do not work with assigned devices. Earlier versions of this
> > patch have circulated on kvm@vger.
>
> How does this play with the pci-stub driver that I thought was written
> to solve this very problem?


AFAIK the problem pci stub was written to solve is simply to bind to a
device. You then have to use another kernel module which looks the
device up with something like pci_get_bus_and_slot to do anything
useful. In particular, for non-shared interrupts, we can disable the
interrupt in the apic. But this does not work well for shared
interrupts. Thus this work.

The uio driver will be used in virtualization scenarious, a couple
of possible ones that have been mentioned on the kvm list are:
- device assignment (guest access to device) for simple devices with
shared interrupts: emulating PCI is tricky enough to better be done in
userspace. shared interrupt support is important as it happens
with real devices
- simple communication between guest and host:
we create a virtual device in host, and userspace
driver in guest gets events and passes them on
to e.g. dbus. shared interrupt support is important
to avoid wasting irqs


> Will it conflict?

No in a sense that you can't bind both drivers to the same device.

> In fact, it looks like you copied the comments for this driver directly
> from the pci-stub driver :)

Right.

> How about moving that documentation into a place that people will notice
> it, like the rest of the UIO documentation?

OK.

> And right now you are just sending the irq to userspace, what is
> userspace supposed to do with it?

Userspace uses libpci (i.e. pci sysfs) to talk to the device and to
re-enable interrupts by writing to the command register.

In the case of device assignment, this will be qemu which
acts as a proxy for driver running in guest context.
In case of uio loaded in guest, the driver will be in guest
userspace, and the device is emulated in qemu.


> Do you have a userspace program that
> uses this interface today to verify that everything works? If so, care
> to provide a pointer to it?

Sure. I used an emulated device for this.
First, you patch qemu to add the device:
http://www.linux-kvm.org/downloads/mst/test_irq.patch

Now, run with the new kernel (-kernel flag), adding
-device test-irq

Once in guest, assign the device id
echo "1af4 2009" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/uio_pci_generic/new_id

Compile and run this driver:
http://www.linux-kvm.org/downloads/mst/testuio.c
(it does not use any libraries besides libc,
so just gcc testuio.c -o testuio)

And now make the device assert interrupts, like this:

while
sleep 1
do
setpci -s 00:04.0 0x40.B=0x1
done

You should see messages printed as the driver gets interrupts, but no
error messages about missed interrupts.

> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-16 14:35    [W:0.110 / U:1.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site