lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Possible Suspend to Ram bug?
Date
On Tue July 14 2009, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > On Fri July 10 2009, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > > I've recently gotten a new OCZ Vertex 30G SSD and have noticed that it
> > > will flip out the second time linux wakes up from "suspend to ram".
> > >
> > > The system will run fine for days or weeks, so long as it isn't waking
> > > up a second StR.
> > >
> > > Here is an example error that I get from the device (my root / device):
> > >
> > > [42018.455204] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Unhandled error code
> > > [42018.455208] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET
> > > driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK
> > > [42018.455215] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 12583031
> > > [42018.455221] EXT3-fs error (device sda2): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable
> > > to read inode block - inode=391005, block=1572871
> > >
> > > At that point using my / fs is pretty much impossible. Every single app
> > > fails to launch with an I/O Error, about the only command I can run in
> > > that state is "dmesg" in an existing konsole.
> > >
> > > I'm currently using 2.6.29-2-amd64 from debian, and am running on a
> > > Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P, with a AMD Phenom II X4 810 cpu, and 4G ram.
> > >
> > > One interesting thing to note, the file system on the Vertex SSD
> > > reports as clean to fsck on the next boot, while my /home which is on a
> > > Seagate 7200.12 drive reports with several orphaned inodes (every
> > > single time). And that's regardless if I use ALT+SYSRQ+S/U to try and
> > > sync everything. Also, ALT+SYSRQ+B doesn't work at that point, only
> > > ALT+SYSRQ+O or using the system power/reset buttons will work.
> > >
> > > I'm attaching the full log I was able to save from dmesg (over nfs,
> > > luckily that worked).
> >
> > Anyone have a clue what might be wrong?
>
> First please try to reproduce with recent kernel (2.6.30 at least,
> 2.6.31-rc3 preferrably).

I'll try with debian's 2.6.30 first. But there's a small issue with that, .30
and .31 seem to have some performance regressions according to sites like
phoronix.

--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@shaw.ca


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-15 12:11    [W:0.070 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site