Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:32:09 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions |
| |
On Tuesday 2009-07-14 00:20, Jamie Lokier wrote: >> The next best would probably be UDF, which is already used on DVDs >> and thus is implemented in a number of devices - though probably >> only disc-reading ones. >> There's your market hole, dear vendors. > >UDF has already been mentioned on this thread, next to "looks usable >in theory, now try it and find out it isn't". >
Sorry if I was showing a lack of enthusiasm discussing, let alone reading, the legalese subthreads. Please do not expect everybody to follow LKML as close as akpm/jcm.
The fact that people even dropped the mailing list from Cc on a subthread effectively rendered my ~/.procmailrc sort-to-folder rules useless so that I just decided to hit Thread-Delete to get rid of it from the master INBOX.
-jeng
| |