[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] wireless: wl12xx, fix lock imbalance
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 23:44 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:

> > I've had local hacks
> > many times to make sparse aware of mutexes, is there a reason they are
> > not annotated with __acquire(s)/__release(s) like spinlocks etc.?
> Mutexes are often locked/unlocked interprocedural which I think sparse
> can't do much about.

Well, you annotate those functions too, of course.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-13 23:53    [W:0.045 / U:1.196 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site