Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:50:25 +0800 | From | Xiao Guangrong <> | Subject | [PATCH] tracing: fix trace_print_seq() |
| |
We will lose something if trace_seq->buffer[0] is 0, because the copy length is calculated by strlen() in seq_puts(), so using seq_write() instead of seq_puts().
There have a example: after reboot: # echo kmemtrace > current_tracer # echo 0 > options/kmem_minimalistic # cat trace # tracer: kmemtrace # # Nothing is exported, because the first byte of trace_seq->buffer[ ] is KMEMTRACE_USER_ALLOC. ( the value of KMEMTRACE_USER_ALLOC is zero, seeing kmemtrace_print_alloc_user() in kernel/trace/kmemtrace.c)
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> --- kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c index 7938f3a..e0c2545 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c @@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ void trace_print_seq(struct seq_file *m, struct trace_seq *s) { int len = s->len >= PAGE_SIZE ? PAGE_SIZE - 1 : s->len; - s->buffer[len] = 0; - seq_puts(m, s->buffer); + seq_write(m, s->buffer, len); trace_seq_init(s); } -- 1.6.1.2
| |