lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 5/5] tracing/events: modify kmem print to new format
From
Date
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:45 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> +#define show_gfp_flags(end...) \
> + "0=GFP_NOWAIT," \
> + "0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s," \
> + "0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s," \
> + "0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s," \
> + "0x%lx=%s,0x%lx=%s>" end , \
> + (unsigned long)GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, "GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE", \
> + (unsigned long)GFP_HIGHUSER, "GFP_HIGHUSER", \
> + (unsigned long)GFP_USER, "GFP_USER", \
> + (unsigned long)GFP_TEMPORARY, "GFP_TEMPORARY", \
> + (unsigned long)GFP_KERNEL, "GFP_KERNEL", \
> + (unsigned long)GFP_NOFS, "GFP_NOFS", \
> + (unsigned long)GFP_ATOMIC, "GFP_ATOMIC", \
> + (unsigned long)GFP_NOIO, "GFP_NOIO", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_HIGH, "GFP_HIGH", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_WAIT, "GFP_WAIT", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_IO, "GFP_IO", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_COLD, "GFP_COLD", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_NOWARN, "GFP_NOWARN", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_REPEAT, "GFP_REPEAT", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_NOFAIL, "GFP_NOFAIL", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_NORETRY, "GFP_NORETRY", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_COMP, "GFP_COMP", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_ZERO, "GFP_ZERO", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_NOMEMALLOC, "GFP_NOMEMALLOC", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_HARDWALL, "GFP_HARDWALL", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_THISNODE, "GFP_THISNODE", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_RECLAIMABLE, "GFP_RECLAIMABLE", \
> + (unsigned long)__GFP_MOVABLE, "GFP_MOVABLE"

Just curious, how unhappy does stuff become when we add a __GFP_ flag
and forget to extend this table?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-09 09:17    [W:0.249 / U:1.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site