[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing/events/ring-buffer: block trace points and fix
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Li Zefan wrote:
>>>>> In file included from mm/highmem.c:30:
>>>>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:223: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list
>>>>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:223: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
>>>>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h: In function ?blk_cmd_buf_len?:
>>>>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:225: error: implicit declaration of function ?blk_pc_request?
>>>>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:225: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>>>>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h: At top level:
>>>>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:228: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list
>>>>> include/linux/blktrace_api.h:230: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list
>>>>> distcc[15629] ERROR: compile mm/highmem.c on a/32 failed
>>>> I've fixed it. I'll post a new version after I've done some
>>>> more building tests.
>>> Ingo,
>>> Should Li post a delta fix, or should we just rebase?
>> I thought we should rebase it, since it causes building failure which
>> might hurt bisectability.
> The failure happens when CONFIG_BLOCK is not defined. How many configs
> really do that?

Ah, I see. I'll post a delta fix.

btw, I found many includes of blktrace_api.h has become unneeded since
blktrace moved to trace points. I'll post another patch to remove those
includes later.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-10 03:51    [W:0.065 / U:3.204 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site