lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full
Mel Gorman wrote:

> There is a side-effect to this patch. Currently, if zone_reclaim()
> successfully reclaimed SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, an allocation attempt would
> go ahead. With this patch applied, zone watermarks are rechecked after
> zone_reclaim() does some work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

--
All rights reversed.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-09 20:15    [W:0.108 / U:20.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site