Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:22:54 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] x86: clear TS in irq_ts_save() when in an atomic section |
| |
* Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> - if (!in_interrupt()) > + if (!in_atomic() && !in_interrupt()) > return 0;
since in_interrupt() implies in_atomic() (upstream), why not just do:
if (!in_atomic()) return 0;
?
Ingo
| |