[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA
Mel Gorman wrote:

> The scanning occurs because zone_reclaim() cannot tell
> in advance the scan is pointless because the counters do not distinguish
> between pagecache pages backed by disk and by RAM.

Yes it can. Since 2.6.27, filesystem backed and swap/ram backed
pages have been living on separate LRU lists. This allows you to
fix the underlying problem, instead of having to add a retry

All rights reversed.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-08 15:35    [W:0.229 / U:2.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site