Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:45:44 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] writeback: skip new or to-be-freed inodes |
| |
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 05:29:30PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Thank you. Basically I'm not sure if UBIFS guarantees it won't be > unmounted (hence the MS_ACTIVE bit is on) when calling > generic_sync_sb_inodes() in shrink_liability() and ubifs_sync_fs().
Btw, the call in ubifs_sync_fs should be superflous in the vfs-2.6#for-next tree. We now do make sure that all inodes are flushed before calling ->sync_fs with the wait parameter.
shrink_liability is a more interesting case, I don't understand enough of ubifs to comment on it.
| |