Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:09:47 +0300 | Subject | Re: [git pull] IDE fixes | From | Pekka Enberg <> |
| |
Hi Bartlomiej,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote: >> > My honest opinion is that it is as appropriate now as it will be 2.6.31. >> > >> > [ I'm still amazed by the amount of *completely* bogus reasons given for >> > not merging it. ] >> >> I don't consider this a bogus reason at all: >> >> 10 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > Since when do we validate code quality based solely on LOC changed? :)
Since when we entered -rc8 (or even earlier).
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm yet to see anybody posting a single code chunk in this whole discussion.
That's because I am not objecting to the code. I am objecting to the fact that you're submitting something as big as this so late in the release cycle and the fact that it's not a clear-cut bug fix.
But anyway, I don't really want to argue about this. I simply wanted to point out that I agree with Alan's and James' comments and that I don't think they have anything to do with "slowing down IDE fixes" but rather with how the whole release cycle with fixed merge window works.
Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |