[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BUILD FAILURE 01/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/staging/comedi/drivers.o]
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 02:16:46PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 17:56 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > Read my reply to Greg. Why the heck are you trying to map memory
> > > non-cacheable in the first place ?
> >
> > I agree, this is extremely fishy.
> >
> > I guess the issue is that the driver wants consistent DMA memory
> > but wants to allocate a huge area vmap() style.
> That's my guess too, and I suppose we should be able to provide an
> appropriate interface for that... There are two aspects that
> are completely separate here:
> - One is the allocation of the pages themselves which much match
> the various criteria for DMA'bility to the target device (fit the
> DMA mask, etc...)
> - One is the creation of the virtual mapping in kernel space for which
> appropriate pgprot for DMA must be provided.
> For the first one, I don't know how legit it would be to allocate the
> pages using dma_alloc_coherent one page at a time and try to figure out
> the struct page * out of it. Sounds fishy and possibly non-portable. So
> appart from using normal GFP and crossing fingers I'm not sure what
> would be the right way to obtain the pages in the first place. Maybe we
> should provide something.
> The second could be as simple as having a pgprot_dma_coherent() like we
> have a pgprot_uncached() for example, which would be either uncached or
> cached depending on the consistency of DMA on the platform. But we need
> to run that through things like MIPS which may have additional virtual
> address space requirements.

All good questions. So, let's ask the original authors :)

Frank and Ian, any thoughts about the vmap call in the
comedi_buf_alloc() call? Why is it using PAGE_KERNEL_NOCACHE, and what
is the prealloc_buf buffer used for?

The problem is that PAGE_KERNEL_NOCACHE isn't a "standard" interface,
and not all architectures support it.


greg k-h

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-06 07:55    [W:0.043 / U:13.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site