[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] ieee802154: add documentation about our stack
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Marcel Holtmann<> wrote:
>> Hmm. AX.25, AppleTalk, CAN, DecNet, most of other procotols sitting inside
>> Linux kernel do use net_device structure, why should we differ?
> Don't know about CAN since I never looked deep enough into it. However
> for the other, they do transport some sort of networking packets over
> it. So my point is as long as I can use ifconfig of ip to set an address
> on these interfaces and route them it makes sense to. Just to reuse
> net_device because it is convenient for a control interface sounds wrong
> to me. The IrDA stuff is one big example of this.

ieee802154 does actually transport networking packets. It is
networking and not just another peer-to-peer interface, so I guess it
shall be implemented as a network.

Kind regards,

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-06 09:15    [W:0.047 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site