[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [benchmark] 1% performance overhead of paravirt_ops on native kernels
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:01:25 pm Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
> > I think you're missing the point of Rusty's benchmark. I see his
> > exercise as "compare a kernel configured as a distro would vs a
> > custom-built kernel configured for the exact target environment". In
> > that light, questions about the CONFIG options Rusty used should be based
> > on whether most distros would use them in their stock kernels as opposed
> > to how necessary they are.
> Well. The test ran on a machine with so much memory that you need
> HIGHMEM to use it all. I think it also was SMP. So a custom kernel for
> *that* machine would certainly include SMP and HIGHMEM ...

I have a UP machine with 512M of RAM, but I wasn't going to take it out just
to prove the point. Hence I used my test machine with mem=880 maxcpus=1 to
simulate it, but that's a distraction here.

> While it might be
> interesting by itself to see what the overhead of these config options
> is, it is IMHO quite pointless *in the context of this discussion*.

No, you completely missed the point.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-05 16:35    [W:0.148 / U:0.952 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site