lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] procfs: provide stack information for threads
From
Date

Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 04:37 -0700 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:23:48 +0200 Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> wrote:
> > - slime done
>
> What's "slime"?
>

Sorry, that was a typo, should be "slim down".

> > + for (i = vma->vm_start; i+PAGE_SIZE <= stkpage; i += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > +
> > + page = follow_page(vma, i, 0);
> > +
> > + if (!IS_ERR(page) && page)
>
> Shouldn't this be !page?
>

No, this is correct... I walk through the top of vma to the first mapped
page, this is the high water mark of the stack.

> > + unsigned long stack_start;
> > +
> > + stack_start =
> > + ((struct proc_maps_private *)
> > + m->private)->task->stack_start;
>
> I'd suggested a clearer/cleaner way of implementing this.
>

Sorry, i can not see a problem here. In your last posting you wrote
thats okay! And i have no idea how to make this expression
clearer/cleaner.

> > Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
>
> This should be positioned at the end of the changelog, ahead of the
> patch itself.
>

Next time i will do this, okay?




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-04 13:59    [W:0.044 / U:1.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site