lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: mmotm 2009-06-30-12-50 uploaded
    On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:19:48 -0700
    Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:

    > Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

    (I wasn't cc'ed?)

    > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:51:30 PDT, akpm@linux-foundation.org said:
    > >> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-06-30-12-50 has been uploaded to
    > >
    > > This dies with quilt 0.44, thusly:
    > >
    > > Applying patch procfs-provide-stack-information-for-threads-v08.patch
    > > can't find file to patch at input line 20
    > > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
    > > The text leading up to this was:
    > > --------------------------
    > > |From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
    > > |
    > > |A patch to give a better overview of the userland application stack usage,
    > > |especially for embedded linux.
    > > |
    > > |Currently you are only able to dump the main process/thread stack usage
    > > |which is showed in /proc/pid/status by the "VmStk" Value. But you get no
    > > |information about the consumed stack memory of the the threads.
    > > |
    > > |There is an enhancement in the /proc/<pid>/{task/*,}/*maps and which marks
    > > |the vm mapping where the thread stack pointer reside with "[thread stack
    > > |xxxxxxxx]". xxxxxxxx is the maximum size of stack. This is a value
    > > |information, because libpthread doesn't set the start of the stack to the
    > > |top of the mapped area, depending of the pthread usage.
    > > |
    > > |A sample output of /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/maps looks like:
    > > |
    > > |08048000-08049000 r-xp 00000000 03:00 8312 /opt/z
    > > |08049000-0804a000 rw-p 00001000 03:00 8312 /opt/z

    The next line is:

    a7d12000-a7d13000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0

    And I bet stupid patch(1) saw that "---" and decided that it was the
    start of a diff.

    Try adding `-u' to the patch(1) command?

    I use something like

    patch -u -f -p1 --fuzz=1 -s


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-30 22:39    [W:3.487 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site