lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: fix race in the receive/select
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:48:46PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 08:04:12PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 06/28, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> ...
> > > Hmm... of course:
> > >
> > > static inline void sock_poll_wait(struct file * filp, struct sock *sk, poll_table *p)
> > > {
> > > if (p && sk->sk_sleep) {
> > > __poll_wait(filp, sk->sk_sleep, p);
> > > /*
> > > * fat comment
> > > */
> > > smp_mb(); // or smp_mb__after_unlock();
> > > }
> > > }
> >
> > Perhaps it makes sense to check ->sk_sleep != NULL in sock_poll_wait(), but
> > I don't think we need __poll_wait(). poll_wait() is inline, I think gcc
> > will optimize out "if (p && wait_address)" check if poll_wait() is called
> > from sock_poll_wait().
>
> Sure, to me it looks a bit more readable, but let Jiri choose.;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Jarek P.

yes :) I like more Jarek's way.. and I'll send separate patch for the
smp_mb_after_lock change.

thanks,
jirka


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-29 11:31    [W:0.062 / U:1.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site